Jan 30, 2008, 04:17 AM // 04:17
|
#41
|
Furnace Stoker
|
Are you sure you had the right person *selected* when typing /report ?
The most common mistake is clicking the person's name on the chat, just as if you wanted to whisp him, but instead of whisping you type /report. The effect is that a random person you had *targetted* gets reported.
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 04:48 AM // 04:48
|
#42
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Dec 2006
Guild: Goon Squad [LLJK]
Profession: Mo/
|
It doesn't matter, the support team checks all player-sent reports.
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 05:20 AM // 05:20
|
#43
|
ArenaNet
|
I just tested this, and I think you're under a misimpression about how to use /report. - You can type in a name if you do not select a player.
- You can select a player and that name is automatically placed into the report page.
I selected a player, typed /report and that player's name was featured in the report page that popped up. If I selected a player and typed /report and another name, that didn't work and honestly, I don't think it's supposed to work that way. The selection (the name of the selected player) overrides the typed text, which is designed to make it easier to report.
You select a player to /report. Only if you have no one selected will it work with a typed name. This means you have to deselect any player, which you can do by choosing the Xunlai Chest, a Henchman or NPC, etc. Then, while not selecting someone in the district, you can type /report (name of player here) and that name will be filled in on the report page.
Incidentally, no one was blocked with a report or even two. And no one is banned for a single erroneous report or two. We look at aggregates before we block, which means it would most likely take more than two to result in a block.
__________________
Gaile Gray
Support Liaison
ArenaNet
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 05:41 AM // 05:41
|
#44
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Mar 2007
Profession: Rt/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
I just tested this, and I think you're under a misimpression about how to use /report. - You can type in a name if you do not select a player.
- You can select a player and that name is automatically placed into the report page.
I selected a player, typed /report and that player's name was featured in the report page that popped up. If I selected a player and typed /report and another name, that didn't work and honestly, I don't think it's supposed to work that way. The selection (the name of the selected player) overrides the typed text, which is designed to make it easier to report.
You select a player to /report. Only if you have no one selected will it work with a typed name. This means you have to deselect any player, which you can do by choosing the Xunlai Chest, a Henchman or NPC, etc. Then, while not selecting someone in the district, you can type /report (name of player here) and that name will be filled in on the report page.
Incidentally, no one was blocked with a report or even two. And no one is banned for a single erroneous report or two. We look at aggregates before we block, which means it would most likely take more than two to result in a block.
|
Thanks Gaile for clarifying. But like I said earlier, don't worry, I've done this a few time already and I never got banned.
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 01:33 PM // 13:33
|
#45
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
I just tested this, and I think you're under a misimpression about how to use /report. - You can type in a name if you do not select a player.
- You can select a player and that name is automatically placed into the report page.
I selected a player, typed /report and that player's name was featured in the report page that popped up. If I selected a player and typed /report and another name, that didn't work and honestly, I don't think it's supposed to work that way. The selection (the name of the selected player) overrides the typed text, which is designed to make it easier to report.
You select a player to /report. Only if you have no one selected will it work with a typed name. This means you have to deselect any player, which you can do by choosing the Xunlai Chest, a Henchman or NPC, etc. Then, while not selecting someone in the district, you can type /report (name of player here) and that name will be filled in on the report page.
Incidentally, no one was blocked with a report or even two. And no one is banned for a single erroneous report or two. We look at aggregates before we block, which means it would most likely take more than two to result in a block.
|
Well the other person did have me in their party so they probably did have me targeted, and i probably had them targeted when the bot pmed me
Thank you for clearing that up
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 03:21 PM // 15:21
|
#46
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
I selected a player, typed /report and that player's name was featured in the report page that popped up. If I selected a player and typed /report and another name, that didn't work and honestly, I don't think it's supposed to work that way. The selection (the name of the selected player) overrides the typed text, which is designed to make it easier to report.
You select a player to /report. Only if you have no one selected will it work with a typed name. This means you have to deselect any player, which you can do by choosing the Xunlai Chest, a Henchman or NPC, etc. Then, while not selecting someone in the district, you can type /report (name of player here) and that name will be filled in on the report page.
|
Honestly, that is a pretty stupid way for it to work. The typed name should be overriding the UI selection - as the selected character could easily be a mistake, and the intended character could be spamming from another district/outpost.
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 05:03 PM // 17:03
|
#47
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muspellsheimr
Honestly, that is a pretty stupid way for it to work. The typed name should be overriding the UI selection - as the selected character could easily be a mistake, and the intended character could be spamming from another district/outpost.
|
I agree - very clumsy and very counter intuitive - a very bad design decision.
How could we not be under a "misimpression"? There are no instructions on these kinds of things and the intuitive way would be to assume the typed name would take precedence.
Last edited by Mork from Ork; Jan 30, 2008 at 05:05 PM // 17:05..
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2008, 06:37 PM // 18:37
|
#48
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Profession: R/
|
Well there you have it then. Matter settled
~closed~
Last edited by Commander Ryker; Jan 30, 2008 at 06:39 PM // 18:39..
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05 AM // 09:05.
|